# Education: assistants are now the first place people go to choose a course

"Is there a part-time data course I can do while working, recognised in Germany?" This used to be a
search; it is now a conversation with an assistant. The providers that appear in the answer are the
ones whose format, price, duration and recognition are stated as text.

## The four facts that decide inclusion

- **Format and workload.** Online, in person, hybrid; hours per week; how long in total.
- **Cost.** The number, plus whether funding, instalments or employer billing exist.
- **What it leads to.** A certificate, a regulated qualification, a portfolio, nothing formal.
  Say which — honestly. Overstating recognition is the fastest way to be excluded.
- **Prerequisites.** Who this is for, and what you need before starting.

## Outcomes beat curriculum

A module list describes what you teach. A sentence about who takes the course and what they do
afterwards describes when to recommend it. Only the second one helps a model answer a person who is
describing their own situation.

## The trust problem

Education is full of unverifiable claims, so assistants lean towards providers who state checkable
things: registration with a named body, an accreditation number, a founding year, a country. Plain
facts are what get you into the answer.

## What is listed here

Every provider below has a listing page and a markdown twin, linked from this article, the category
feed and llms.txt, with a public count of AI-crawler fetches taken from raw server logs.

## Companies listed in this category

_No companies listed here yet._

Directory: https://pixelsforbots.com/c/education · All categories: https://pixelsforbots.com/llms.txt